repository · survival report #6 · 2026-10-19 · method v4 · unranked

pydantic/pydantic-ai

In Survival Report #6 (2026-10-19, method v4): 584,351 of 689,024 lines introduced by 354 AI-tagged commits are still at HEAD, 84.8 %. These are counts, not grades. No rank, no colour, no verdict, and no comparison with any other repository on this page. Every number links to the audit bytes behind it and the method and its limits are public.

GitHub · latest.json · badge.svg · Survival Report #6 · all repositories · Atom feed

Baseline: this repository's untagged lines

Commits with no machine-readable AI signal, human-written, inline-completed or untagged-agent code alike: 3,960 commits, 2,075,749 lines introduced, 1,667,215 still at HEAD (80.3 % line-weighted, 75.9 % median per commit). Age is the time from a commit to HEAD. The baseline was added in method v3 and is unchanged later; definition at causari.dev/method.

Age-matched: AI-tagged lines 84.8 % against untagged lines in the matched age windows 83.6 %, a gap of +1.2 pts, over 5 age windows holding 100 % of the AI-tagged lines.

Line ageAI-taggedcommitsUntaggedcommits
0–30 d86.2 %2687.3 %930
30–90 d70.8 %4085.0 %777
90–180 d76.5 %10274.4 %468
180–365 d87.2 %17984.9 %509
365–730 d88.9 %760.1 %1,248
730+ d—034.9 %28

By agent, in Survival Report #6

Alphabetical. A commit is attributed to the agent its metadata names; one agent per commit. VERIFIED commits only.

AgentCommitsLines introducedStill at HEADLine-weightedCapped
claude-code338682,483579,68384.9 %76.3 %
cursor31,1561,01387.6 %87.6 %
devin73,8152,65669.6 %69.6 %
github-copilot41,35780559.3 %59.3 %
openai-codex221319491.1 %91.1 %

History across reports

One row per report this repository was measured in, oldest first; each report measured HEAD as of its own date. The line is the line-weighted ratio on a fixed 0 – 100 % axis; each point is one report.

Line-weighted ratio across reports, 0 to 100 %: #2 87.6 %; #3 86.9 %; #4 84.9 %; #5 84.9 %; #6 84.8 %

Reproduce

One command, any machine, no account: the same bytes the report was built from. The exact bytes behind this page are repos/pydantic__pydantic-ai.json of Survival Report #6. Open an issue with your JSON if it differs.

re audit pydantic/pydantic-ai --json   # method v4, full clone

Badge

Text only, one colour, no red and no green. It follows the latest report and is cached for one hour. badge-dark.svg is the same badge as paper on ink.

AI code survival  84.8 % · causari · #6 AI code survival  84.8 % · causari · #6, paper on ink

README · Markdown
[![AI code survival](https://causari.dev/r/pydantic/pydantic-ai/badge.svg)](https://causari.dev/r/pydantic/pydantic-ai/)

Coverage

  • Method v4, causari 0.4.1. Detection from commit metadata only; survival from git blame -w -M -C at HEAD.
  • Full clone: yes. Method v4 refuses shallow clones; this row comes from a complete history.
  • Sample: 354 AI-tagged commits; the sample floor is 5. At or above the floor, so the ratio is aggregated into the report.
  • PROBABLE: No PROBABLE commits: every counted commit carries machine-readable AI authorship metadata.
  • Cap: 3,781 lines per commit in this repository; the capped ratio is 76.2 %.
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs: not present in this repository.